ASSESSMENT 1
AIMS: To recap the experiment and methodology.
Conduct the analysis for the report.To cover what should be written in the report. Go over common feedback from the previous report.
WORD COUNT: 2,000 (+/- 10%)
SUBMISSION: Electronic (BREO)
PSY002-1 Psychology Assignment-Bedfordshire University UK
WHAT DID YOU DO?
This experiment explored if naturalistic auditory distraction impeded a choice reaction task:
2 Groups
Control – No audio distraction
Experimental – Heard a loop of a three month old baby crying during task
completion.
Participants completed the Deary-Liewald reaction time task
Specifically we are analysing the Choice Reaction Time Task (CRT)
TITLE & ABSTRACT
Title – You should make your own title. Remember the following…
- Titles should be informative
- Not written as a question
- Should say what you did (Design)
- Should refer to the IV and DV
Abstract should be a short concise summary of each section of your report
- Try to include a sentence or two from each section
- No requirement for citations
- No requirement to report anything other than ‘p’ values for results
INTRODUCTION
a.What is distraction (focus auditory)? Why is it important? Think about current working circumstances under COVID restrictions. CITE SOURCES!
b.What research has already been conducted?
c.What studies are similar and different? Discuss these! Compare and Critique
d.Why should more research take place?
e.How could this research benefit the literature/society?
f.HYPOTHESIS:
g.“Participants’ who hear the naturalistic auditory distraction will take significantly longer to respond to the choice reaction time task when compared to a control.”
h.Do not feel that you must copy the hypothesis word for word…you may edit it slightly to help it fit in your introduction.
PSY002-1 Psychology Assignment-Bedfordshire University UK
METHOD SECTION
Your method section should provide enough detailed information so another psychologist can easily replicate it.
It shouldn’t be hard to determine what was measured, who took part,
what materials were used and exactly what took place.
DESIGN
1.Experimental Or Non Experimental?
2.What design is it? Independent or repeated measures?
3.Independent Variable
How many levels do they have?
What are they?
4.Dependent Variable?
PARTICIPANTS
1.How many took part? – We will be doing this shortly…
2.Who are they, how were they recruited?
3.How many males/ females were there? – next slide
4.What is the average age and std deviation? – next slide
MATERIALS
What was used?
Were there specific measures?
Specific machines, give model numbers, programs used etc.
Any additional equipment?
What examples could be included?
You could include a screen grab of the experiment taking place (available on BREO).
PROCEDURE
1.What happened? This should be chronological.
2.What EXACTLY was said by the experimenter that differed between groups?
3.Ethics- what must you include?
Any specific issues?
E.G. Exclusion of people who felt unwell
4.Are you the experimenter or participant?
5.What tense is it written in? Past, present or future?
6.Is your report written from a first person or third person perspective?
RESULTS
Results Section : We will be doing this shortly
You should include:
Explain how you will address the hypothesis.
Written account of descriptive statistics
Written account of inferential stats tests with APA formatted results. E.G. t(??) = ??, p=??
A bar chart with error bars that illustrates the findings.
DISCUSSION
1.What was the hypothesis?
2.Was it accepted or rejected?
3.Does this result match the research discussed in your introduction and/or
other research your have found?
4.What does this finding mean?
5.What would you do next? (Remember third person)
RESULTS
Open the data file under “Assessment and Feedback” >>“Assessment 1”
Generate the following:
- Participants Section:
- Average & SD for age
- Age minimum and maximum
- Frequency of Males and Females
- Frequency of Parental Status
- Results Section:
- Run appropriate t-test
- Grouping variable is the condition variable (1 & 2)
- Test variable is the score
- Generate a bar chart with error bars
- Make axis labels nice if needed.
GET STARTED!
To start writing this report read about divided attention, think about specific instances in everyday life that this might be important.
Discover/Google Scholar.
Start to read more broadly. Look for specific journal articles from academic sources, NOT Wikipedia, Psych Central or similar sources.
MOST TYPICAL COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS YEARS:
- The introduction is often too similar to previous sources.
- No evidence that any research has been carried out to write the report,students do not always find journals beyond those given.
- The method section sometimes sounds like a shopping list rather written in prose.
- In-text references aren’t in the Reference section and vice versa.
- SPSS tables are in the results section instead of own tables in word.
- Discussion just ends, does not relate back to previous theories, empirical studies or new ideas for research
PSY002-1 Psychology Assignment-Bedfordshire University UK
QUESTIONS?
1.Use the remainder of this session to catch up with anything you have missed with your tutor!
2.Post questions on the discussion forum in the assessment 1 folder.
1.Tutors will check this weekly and answer questions
Please help by trying to answer your peers’ questions (great way to
anchor your own knowledge!)
2. On the above point, please remember that your peers may be incorrect –
listen to tutors above peers!
ORDER This PSY002-1 Psychology Assignment NOW And Get Instant Discount
Read More :-
PSY001-2 Critical Review Assessment 1 – Bedfordshire University UK.
